PDA

Vollständige Version anzeigen : Josh Barnett und Eddie Bravo Debatte: BJJ vs Catch



Teashi
16-01-2011, 19:18
From: EddieBravo Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile
Posted: 23 hours ago
10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu, President
Member Since: 5/9/02
Posts: 4109


"Did you actually say Catch Wrestling sucks?"

I don't think I ever said catch wrestling sucks.

I said that yes, it has been around way before UFC 1, and yes there are many legit submissions in catch, but the transitions and set ups from catch are way inferior to bjj, that's why they had to fake matches back in the days of carnival wrestling.

Weak set ups equal very few finishes, which equals very boring matches, unless they picked some schlub out of a carnival crowd to challenge the star carnival pro wreslter.

Even 85 year old catch wreslter "Lil Dinosaur" told me himself that no one played guard back then, he said the guard was a position no one worked on in his camp because he felt there was nothing there.

Now how can you have a superior grappling style if it doesn't include a guard with attacks and a guard that is hard to pass?

To me, that is a style with a big glaring hole right there.

If the Gracies hadn't spent most of their time working on passing guard, attacking from the mount, perfecting back control and making the guard more dangerous, today's mma would not exist. We would still only have fake pancrase matches with terrible technique. All you gotta do is watch those old Japanese pancrase and shooto fights to see how primitive the grappling was.

The bottom line all the catch wrestling and judo guys have to remember is, the Gracies brought old judo and catch techniques to a level where you don't have to fake fights anymore to avoid 3 hour stale mates. You have to give it up to Helio. I don't agree with ALOT of things Helio says about modern day jiu jitsu for MMA, but the fact remains that it wasn't for the Gracies, no one would know you I am or Josh Barnett or Quincy.

Why is there a huge "brazilian" jiu jitsu scene in Japan if it's all just judo and catch? The Japanese recognize that the brazilian style of judo and catch is by far the best form of grappling for mma, otherwise they would just keeping doing judo and catch like they had been doing for hundreds of years.


"What are your thoughts on this skills of Mr Barnett?"

I think Josh's grappling skills are top 10 among heavyweights in mma. He's got great leg locks and his guard is pretty dangerous for a big guy.

I don't blame him for talking shit on the rubber guard, it's not his fault that he hasn't sparred with a 250 pound rubber guard master yet.

When it comes to submissions, mma figters usually only want to learn from guys that can submit them. If a small guy cant submit them they are usually not interested in learing from him. But when it comes to boxing, that is not the case for some reason. Look at most heavyweight boxers, they are usually trained by little old guys that could never land any of those combinations that they teach on the fighter they are training.

But for some reason, big guys in mma aren't too interested in learning submissions from small guys.




From: Josh Barnett Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile
Posted: 14 hours ago
Member Since: 1/31/08
Posts: 227


Eddie,

"I said that yes, it has been around way before UFC 1, and yes there are many legit submissions in catch, but the transitions and set ups from catch are way inferior to bjj, that's why they had to fake matches back in the days of carnival wrestling."

- They had worked matches because that way you could insure the outcomes you wanted and the entertainment factor. How often do we read complaints about lame, boring fights in MMA? It happens sometimes but when you work it you can keep that from happening and keep people paying. It had nothing to do with "inferior" setups. That's BS.

"Weak set ups equal very few finishes, which equals very boring matches, unless they picked some schlub out of a carnival crowd to challenge the star carnival pro wreslter."

-No. What you got was two highly accomplished wrestlers often not being able to finish the other in an exciting fashion. Sound like ADCC or any other high level grappling even anyone? Happen's all the time in those.

"Now how can you have a superior grappling style if it doesn't include a guard with attacks and a guard that is hard to pass?

To me, that is a style with a big glaring hole right there."

-There wasn't a need for the "guard" or "bottom leg scissors" because you could be pinned under the rules of standard catch or pro wrestling matches. With the advent of MMA in the modern era, the modern catch wrestler adapts. Sakuraba, Tamura and others haven't had a huge disadvantage and neither have I.

"If the Gracies hadn't spent most of their time working on passing guard, attacking from the mount, perfecting back control and making the guard more dangerous, today's mma would not exist. We would still only have fake pancrase matches with terrible technique. All you gotta do is watch those old Japanese pancrase and shooto fights to see how primitive the grappling was.

The bottom line all the catch wrestling and judo guys have to remember is, the Gracies brought old judo and catch techniques to a level where you don't have to fake fights anymore to avoid 3 hour stale mates. You have to give it up to Helio. I don't agree with ALOT of things Helio says about modern day jiu jitsu for MMA, but the fact remains that it wasn't for the Gracies, no one would know you I am or Josh Barnett or Quincy.

Why is there a huge "brazilian" jiu jitsu scene in Japan if it's all just judo and catch? The Japanese recognize that the brazilian style of judo and catch is by far the best form of grappling for mma, otherwise they would just keeping doing judo and catch like they had been doing for hundreds of years."

-If catch hadn't been around Maeda never would have went to Brazil to pro wrestle and the Gracies would never have learned Judo so right there, without pro wrestling and catch there would be no BJJ.

You don't have to "fake fights" and they had plenty of long ass matches in BJJ and Vale Tudo also. Was it because BJJ was inferior? No. It was even related. Did BJJ guys need to throw matches in Abu Dhabi because now the committe has a whole section it in the rules after some incidents. No, I won't name names. That's unprofessional and if you want to figure out go re-watch 'em.

There is big BJJ scene in Japan for the same reason as any: it is popular for one reason or another. Because Rogan and others refer to all grappling as Jiu Jitsu. Becaus of the Gracies in the beginning. But it isn't because it is the "superior" art. It is just another form of grappling which more and more starts to resemble wrestling and catch with the setups, rides, and takedown work that wasn't there 4-5 years ago. Sounds like adapation to me. Just like we catch guys do to counter BJJ dogma and general tactics.

"I don't blame him for talking shit on the rubber guard, it's not his fault that he hasn't sparred with a 250 pound rubber guard master yet.

When it comes to submissions, mma figters usually only want to learn from guys that can submit them. If a small guy cant submit them they are usually not interested in learing from him. But when it comes to boxing, that is not the case for some reason. Look at most heavyweight boxers, they are usually trained by little old guys that could never land any of those combinations that they teach on the fighter they are training.

But for some reason, big guys in mma aren't too interested in learning submissions from small guys."

-ALL my submisison work came from smaller partners. I was almost always the biggest guy wherever I was and having another decent heavyweight around was a luxury. This why my game is more dynamic and open and doesn't seem like most heavyweights. Matt Hume was a lot smaller than me and we rolled all the time. Ivan, Roman Roytberg, Reese Andy, and others all were smaller which is why sometimes I would wrestle two at a time. Yep. Imagine having to wrestle Ivan Salaverry and Reese Andy at the same time.

I have never met a 250lb rubber guard master I suppose but it won't make a difference. I can't comment on what your criteria for a "master" would be but I have wrestled with guys of varying sizes that have tried to use rubber guard and haven't been successful. Does that mean it should be discarded? No. Absolutley not. It is another option and tool to be used but it isn't a magic bullet for wreslting as some would imply sometimes.

I never really talked shit on it but you have said many disparaging things about catch not only in yor recent post but with shit like "Dark Planet" and in your rants against Tony C.

I'll just come right out say it that while you are a more than competant teacher and wrestler your opinion on catch is shit. It holds little merit, has almost no foundation and is inconsequential other than that you are a popular known figure in grappling and people pay attention to what you say. I really don't care for your attitude towards catch wrestling and visa-vie myself as a representitive of it. I speak for no one but myself on this as well.

Josh




From: EddieBravo Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile
Posted: 13 hours ago
10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu, President
Member Since: 5/9/02
Posts: 4110

"There wasn't a need for the "guard" or "bottom leg scissors" because you could be pinned under the rules of standard catch or pro wrestling matches. With the advent of MMA in the modern era, the modern catch wrestler adapts. Sakuraba, Tamura and others haven't had a huge disadvantage and neither have I."

That's exactly what I was talking about. Catch is a style of grappling without a guard. The adapting part was crucial and coincidently happened right after the Gracies showed the world how important the guard is and how it looks after years of concentrating on it. Sakuraba even traveled half way around the world to Beverly Hills Jiu Jitsu to check out this Brazilian style of judo.

"If catch hadn't been around Maeda never would have went to Brazil to pro wrestle and the Gracies would never have learned Judo so right there, without pro wrestling and catch there would be no BJJ."

You can also say if it wasn't for caveman style of fighting no style would exist either. The Gracies, and for me, the Machados, never left that part of the story out from the history of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. We all knew about the Japanese master that taught Carlos who then taught Helio who then started to morph the style. It's not some secret story that the Gracies try to keep hidden, we all aware of the significance of Maeda. But why can't hardcore American Judo guys and catch guys admit to the great significance of the Brazilian style of grappling? The Japanese appreciate it, that's for sure, look at all the BJJ academys in Japan.

"I'll just come right out say it that while you are a more than competant teacher and wrestler your opinion on catch is shit."

"Dinosaur", I think his name is Billy Wicks or Robinson, I forget his real name, told me that there is no guard in catch. Couple that with the fact that catch wrestling turned into fake pro wrestling and you can say I know a little about catch.

"I have wrestled with guys of varying sizes that have tried to use rubber guard and haven't been successful. Does that mean it should be discarded? No. Absolutley not. It is another option and tool to be used but it isn't a magic bullet for wreslting as some would imply sometimes."

Well, I, nor any of my students ever said that the rubber guard is a "magic bullet", I only say that it works alot better than any other guard I have tried, especially when punches are added. But I am surpried that you would even say that the rubber guard is "another option and tool" based on what I heard you said in Seattle last weekend, so I am pleased that now you are even considering the rubber guard as an option, I think you would be good at it.




From: Josh Barnett Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile
Posted: 12 hours ago
Member Since: 1/31/08
Posts: 228


So you are basing something on what you "heard" I said?

Well, rubber guard in as much as anything is just another move Moves are moves and how you use them is more about what makes a style than anything else. I personally don't like it but I understand it and feel confident in it enough to help others who wish to use it. I don't disregard anything as you never know when you might face it or when you might need it for coaching.

I have also seen too many people disclocate patellas or do ligament damage to their knees from rubberguard to really endorse it either. High level grapplers at that mind you male and female alike. That's my opinion.

It was Pops Wicks and that's fine he says there is no guard in catch but John Pesek and Joe Stecher both used "the guard" or a derivitive of it and were successful catch wrestlers. Now I doubt it looked anything like a typical BJJ guard but it was a way of using the legs off your back.

No one denies that the Gracies didnt influenece and help popularize modern grappling. Just that BJJ is the alpha and omega in terms or grappling. My stance is that your attacks are unfounded and ignorant.

I don't care for most fundementals of BJJ but applaud anything that a) gets people to wrestle b) anything that helps people to be active and in better shape c) encourages atheltic endeavor. My solution to that is to stick to what I have been taught and in what I believe wrestling is and teach it as such. I don't train or use BJJ and that's that. It's influence is only in that it exists so therefore I need to understand it to deal with it.

If it wasn't for the overall density and complexity of society now-a-days you can bet your ass MMA would be worked just like pro wrestling was. When you control the outcome you can manipulate your audience into shelling out the most. Dont think for a second promoters wouldnt be doing it if they could and if it was 50-70 years ago the MMA scene would be full of works too.

Catch Wrestling can develop a fighter that can hang with any other art on the ground and makes a great base for fighting. One doesn't need to train in BJJ to be a great submission artist. That's what I proclaim and I stick to it.

Josh

pantera
16-01-2011, 19:28
Woah ....

Rocco S.
16-01-2011, 21:06
hatten wir nicht mal vor ewigkeiten einen thread zu genau diesem thema (zumindest aber eine diskussion zu diesem thema)?

Björn Friedrich
16-01-2011, 22:09
Jiu Jitsu ist effizient, elegant und sanft.......

Catch Wrestling ist der Elefant im Porzellanladen, ruckartig, explosiv, aggresiv....

Beides funktioniert, ich hab aber auf Elefanten kein Bock, weil ich neben denen immer so einen kleinen Rüssel habe.......

Tschüß
Björn Friedrich

Shanghai Kid
17-01-2011, 09:06
Ich finde es wird sehr deutlich, dass Josh Barnett hier eine offenere Weltsicht hat als EB, zumal diese auch durch tatsächliches kämpfen und seine langjährige Erfahrung in Wettkämpfen geprägt ist.

Bei Eddie habe ich immer ein bisschen das Gefühl, dass er theoretisiert und damit denkt, seinem "Stil" mehr Bedeutung verschaffen zu können.

Josh hat es am besten gesagt:

"It is just another form of grappling which more and more starts to resemble wrestling and catch with the setups, rides, and takedown work that wasn't there 4-5 years ago. Sounds like adapation to me. Just like we catch guys do to counter BJJ dogma and general tactics."

Ich sehe die Guard als super wichtig an, aber sie hat auch ihre Schwachstellen, vor allem für MMA.

Björn Friedrich
17-01-2011, 09:19
Aber man darf dabei eines auch nie vergessen. BJJ war nie für das moderne MMA gemacht......

Mit all den Zeitlimits, Runden und Stand Ups, geht diese passive Guard Strategie halt oft nicht erfolgreich aus......

Helio hat mal gesagt: Wenn mein Gegner mich nicht besiegen kann, dann hab ich gewonnen und wenn man seine Statur betrachtet weiss man warum....

Catch Wrestling ist für Athleten, für Leute die schneller, aggressiver, explosiver und stärker als ihre Gegner sind. Oder wie die Amis sagen:

Impose your will

BJJ ist für den Zwerg in uns......:-) Das ist eine Einstellungs und Anatomiefrage welche Art und Weise des Fightens wir bevorzugen.....

Und Eddie? Das ist genau so ein Selbstdarsteller wie ich, versucht sich und seine Sache zu hypen.:-) Ich mag ihn:-)

Tschüß
Björn Friedrich

Tschüß
Björn Friedrich

Henry
17-01-2011, 09:41
Das ist genau so ein Selbstdarsteller wie ich, versucht sich und seine Sache zu hypen.:-) Ich mag ihn:-)

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Schwerthase
17-01-2011, 10:17
wow, der Artikel ist ja so richtig voll von Vorurteilen.


Now how can you have a superior grappling style if it doesn't include a guard with attacks and a guard that is hard to pass?

Vielleicht weil der Schulterpin eine Niederlage gebracht hat? Diese Arroganz von wegen "die Gracies waren aber die ersten die...", ist ja echt zum Kotzen und obendrein auch noch falsch.

Was für eine Pfeife


We would still only have fake pancrase matches with terrible technique. All you gotta do is watch those old Japanese pancrase and shooto fights to see how primitive the grappling was.

Grad ein Kampfkünstler sollte wissen, dass einzig die Regeln den Stil bestimmen. Im Shooto hast halt nicht ewig zeit was zu arbeiten sondern schaust dass sobald am Boden bist eine Sub erwischt.

Oogway
17-01-2011, 10:24
C'mon Josh, smash him....:sport069:

Schwerthase
17-01-2011, 10:31
das Witzigste daran ist ja, dass Eddie einem Weltklasse Grappler erzählt sein Stil wär eigentlich Mist, und gleichzeitig seinen eigenen Erfolg auf einen 7 Jahre alten Kampf aufbaut.

Ich mag die Rubberguard sachen auch, find sie ganz witzig. Aber Bedeutung fürs MMA? Yeah, right... Es gibt keine 5 Leut im SpitzenMMA die das sinnvoll nutzen würden. Spricht ja wohl für sich.

Shanghai Kid
17-01-2011, 12:00
Aber man darf dabei eines auch nie vergessen. BJJ war nie für das moderne MMA gemacht......

Mit all den Zeitlimits, Runden und Stand Ups, geht diese passive Guard Strategie halt oft nicht erfolgreich aus......

Helio hat mal gesagt: Wenn mein Gegner mich nicht besiegen kann, dann hab ich gewonnen und wenn man seine Statur betrachtet weiss man warum....

Catch Wrestling ist für Athleten, für Leute die schneller, aggressiver, explosiver und stärker als ihre Gegner sind. Oder wie die Amis sagen:

Impose your will

BJJ ist für den Zwerg in uns......:-) Das ist eine Einstellungs und Anatomiefrage welche Art und Weise des Fightens wir bevorzugen.....

Und Eddie? Das ist genau so ein Selbstdarsteller wie ich, versucht sich und seine Sache zu hypen.:-) Ich mag ihn:-)

Tschüß
Björn Friedrich

Tschüß
Björn Friedrich

Guter Post Björn, sehe ich ähnlich!

maluco
17-01-2011, 12:16
Ich sehe das wie Björn,

BJJ is the art of the little man

komplett anderes Konzept als Ringen oder Catch Wrestling. Dass dort ein Schultersieg das oberste Ziel ist und es dadurch keine Guard gibt ist richtig. Aber wie sinnvoll ist es den Sieger durch Schultersieg zu ermitteln?

Hatte letzte Woche eine Diskussion ob sich BJJ auch in Japan entwickelt hätte. Das habe ich klar mit Nein beantwortet.

Josh ist ein Schwergewicht und er kommt ja prima mit CW klar. Wieso auch nicht. Ich kenne ne menge Ringer die mit Griechisch Römisch oder (wichtig: Oder) Freistil hervorragend klar kommen.

Ob sich Josh in einen 60 Kilo Mann hineinversetzen kann bezweifle ich.

Eddie kann das schon. Auch wenn er lange nicht gekämpft hat (Im Wettkampf). Im Training wird er sich schon austesten.

Gruß Maluco

Teashi
17-01-2011, 12:20
Catch Wrestling ist für Athleten, für Leute die schneller, aggressiver, explosiver und stärker als ihre Gegner sind. Oder wie die Amis sagen:

Impose your will

BJJ ist für den Zwerg in uns......:-) Das ist eine Einstellungs und Anatomiefrage welche Art und Weise des Fightens wir bevorzugen.....
und sakuraba ist also ein tier, was?

Flibb
17-01-2011, 12:32
und sakuraba ist also ein tier, was?

Verglichen mit Royce und Royler ja. Ryan und Renzo waren wenigstens ihm körperlich gewachsen.

jkdberlin
17-01-2011, 12:35
ich finde, wie alle Grappling-"Stile", haben die beiden Berührungspunkte und man kann beides an einigen Stellen miteinander kombinieren bzw. das eine mit dem anderen ergänzen.

Grüsse

Shanghai Kid
17-01-2011, 12:46
ich finde, wie alle Grappling-"Stile", haben die beiden Berührungspunkte und man kann beides an einigen Stellen miteinander kombinieren bzw. das eine mit dem anderen ergänzen.

Grüsse

Du alter Diplomat, was für abwegige Ideen! Am Ende erzählst Du noch was von JKD, oder wie das komische Zeug da heisst! ;)

jkdberlin
17-01-2011, 12:54
JKD-Grappling? Das wär ja mal was :)

sivispacemparabellum
17-01-2011, 18:02
ich finde die Einteilung in explosiv, aggressiv gegenüber elegant und sanft falsch. Auch, dass Cacc nur für große kräftige Leute ist. Ich habe mit vielen Leuten gerungen die sehr elegant und ruhig ihr Ding gemacht haben und dabei sehr technisch mit viel Flow gearbeitet haben. Und die waren keine BJJler. Es gibt ganz klar technische Unterschiede. Guardgame, Halfguard sind da nicht die originären Stärken, aber ein Sack voller Submissions und Takedowns, die ich in der Form und mit den technischen Finessen nur bei guten Wrestlern gesehen habe.
Und Björn trainierst du nicht viel mit Kettlebells, Clubbells....wie jeder olschool Wrestler?
Ich gehe weiter dahin wo ich was lernen kann, egal ob BJJ oder Cacc.

Björn Friedrich
17-01-2011, 20:58
Ich liebe die verschiedenen Trainingsmethoden, auch wenn mein Fokus momentan auf Ashtanga Yoga liegt.

Aber ehrlich gesagt hab ich mein BJJ (schon damals als ich noch ausschliesslich BJJ gemacht habe) immer so trainiert, als hätte ich keine große Kraft und Ausdauer.....

Meine Einstellung ist. Wenn die Technik versagt und alles nur noch ein Krampf ist, brauc ich meine Kraft, aber eben nicht vorher.

Von daher würde ich sagen bin ich wirklich eher komplett auf der entspannten BJJ Seite......

Tschüß
Björn Friedrich

Schwerthase
18-01-2011, 06:09
Aber wie sinnvoll ist es den Sieger durch Schultersieg zu ermitteln?


Wie sinnvoll sind die BJJ, Box, MuayTHai, MMA, ValeTudo Regeln? Alles Sportarten mit unterschiedlichen Regelsystemen. Was ist also "sinnvoll"?

Soldier
18-01-2011, 11:31
Aber bei diesen Sportarten ist das oberste Ziel den Kampf 'tatsächlich' zu beenden mittles Aufgabegriff oder Knockout. Erst wenn das nicht eintritt werden die Punkte sozusagen als Hilfe genommen.

Schwerthase
18-01-2011, 11:40
Aber bei diesen Sportarten ist das oberste Ziel den Kampf 'tatsächlich' zu beenden mittles Aufgabegriff oder Knockout. Erst wenn das nicht eintritt werden die Punkte sozusagen als Hilfe genommen.

Aber innerhalb eines Regelsystems das genau so einschränkt. Im BJJ zB sind wesentlich weniger Griffe erlaubt die einen Kampf "beenden" als im Catch; von den Würfen garnicht mal zu reden.

Jeder Sport hat seine Einschränkungen und das ist auch gut so. Aber zu sagen A>B ist Bullshit.