http://bjjrefspot.blogspot.com/2012/...egal-slam.html
"The slammer held his victim over his head and then jumped into the takedown. Jumping shows an intent to injure, but even without leaving the ground he could have still been disqualified for bringing his opponent down too hard. Once you've picked someone up that high, you are in an awkward situation. Based on the rules, you now have the responsibility for putting your opponent on the mat safely."
(Achtung: das ist nicht der Wortlaut der IBJJF)
Ganz unten auf der Seite ist auch ein Fireman's Carry zu sehen. Dazu heisst es:
"Even though the throw landed hard, there is no reason this match should have been stopped. A fireman's carry isn't even a borderline move, it's always legal unless you do it Brock Lesnar style. "
Hier noch ein Regelvergleich zu dem Thema:
https://www.bjjee.com/articles/under...egit-takedown/
Auch diese Erklärung habe ich gefunden:
"If you complete your slamming take down all in one motion, it is a takedown, but if you lift, then hold in the air for any substantial amount of time, and then drop your opponent with force to the ground, that is a slam."
" Every time I've seen a disqualification for a slam it's been after a pause in motion. I've seen examples where there didn't appear to be an intent to injure, and I'v seen clear intent to injure an opponent, both met with disqualification. The most common is an opponent who jumps guard, the person standing remains standing and eventually quickly and forcefully drops to their knees, dropping the two of them to the ground with force. After that pause the responsibility of getting to the ground safely falls on the person standing."